Finance Columnist Attacks Kid’s Socialist Lemonade Stand, Really

July 7, 2010

(ChattahBox)—A bizarre Ayn Rand-ish rant heard ’round the world attacking a kid’s free lemonade stand as un-American and anti-capitalism, evidencing a “lack of economic responsibility” has been making the rounds of the blogoshpere this week. Terry Savage, a syndicated financial writer for the Chicago-Sun Times penned a Fourth of July screed against free lemonade stands everywhere, writing “There is no ‘free’ lemonade. In giving drink away, girls ignore rules of economics — and sum up what’s wrong with U.S.”

Savage, also contributes to Jim Cramer’s TheStreet and signs off her articles with the signature phrase, “And that’s the Savage Truth.”

When traveling through an upscale neighborhood over July 4th weekend, Savage was horrified to discover a group of little girls accompanied by their commie-socialist nanny operating a free lemonade stand, representing all that’s wrong with our welfare state. So, Savage proceeded to terrorize the little girls sitting on their front lawn, by lecturing them (screeching) on the finer points of capitalism:

“No!” I exclaimed from the back seat. “That’s not the spirit of giving. You can only really give when you give something you own. They’re giving away their parents’ things — the lemonade, cups, candy. It’s not theirs to give.”

“I pushed the button to roll down the window and stuck my head out to set them straight.”

“You must charge something for the lemonade,” I explained. “That’s the whole point of a lemonade stand. You figure out your costs — how much the lemonade costs, and the cups — and then you charge a little more than what it costs you, so you can make money. Then you can buy more stuff, and make more lemonade, and sell it and make more money.”

She wasn’t kidding.


Comments

2 Responses to “Finance Columnist Attacks Kid’s Socialist Lemonade Stand, Really”

  1. Larry on July 8th, 2010 8:49 am

    Terrorized? First her exclamation occured before she engaged the girls, and secondly I’d hardly call explaining something to the girls as terrorizing them, as evidinced by the fact that the girls shrugged it off, apparently unscathed from what you seem to consider a terrorization.

    I’d never heard of this lady before, and don’t really care, but at least be intellectually honest.

    Giving away what is not yours IS immoral, it’s typically called stealing. I’m sure my parents may have had an issue had I choosen to donate their car or TV, or even 5 dollars without at least some cursory understanding of who it was going to, and they are lifelong liberals. Being liberal doesn’t mean having to be irrational, stupid, or a thief. Stop doing the right wing favors by paining them as such.

    In other words, pick better battles.

  2. th on July 8th, 2010 12:37 pm

    isn’t it great? anybody can have a blog!

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.