Walmart Fires Employee After Shoplifter Chase

October 23, 2009


Comments

4 Responses to “Walmart Fires Employee After Shoplifter Chase”

  1. Old Man Dotes on October 23rd, 2009 2:52 pm

    It should be noted that the suspect was not *obviously* armed until *after* the chase took place.

    Wal-Mart should fire the bureaucrat who fires a hero. If that really is the company position – “we fire heroic employees” – then it’s time to boycott Wal-Mart nationwide. Since damn near everything they sell is made in China, that would only help the American economy.

    And if Wal-Mart decides to hire Rutner back to save face, he ought to get a raise AND a big bonus.

  2. Pam on October 23rd, 2009 3:34 pm

    WAL-MART has got to go!!
    This is so stupid.

  3. Paul on October 24th, 2009 7:46 am

    Though this story seems silly and most sensible people would have no issue with what this employee did, Walmart has been forced into this decision for many reasons. But mostly 1: If the emplyee got hurt, he would most likely sue Walmart with his lawyer saying that the employee’s managers told him to put himself in harm’s way and/or 2: The suspect sues Walmart because the employee used excessive force in apprehending him. I agree, this whole thing makes Walmart look silly. But they are in a no-win situation in every direction. You can thank frivolous lawsuits and silly lawmakers and judges for that.

  4. whop on October 28th, 2009 3:16 pm

    I’m first to be a Walmart hater, but some things they do makes sense….http://www.dmcantor.com/news_articles/article.php?id=5
    My friend was Hans, his life was ended to short.

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.