Lisa Bonet and Jason Momoa have second child and the name is …
January 8, 2009
Comments
4 Responses to “Lisa Bonet and Jason Momoa have second child and the name is …”
Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.
What am I reading here, some 15 year old’s blog post or a posting of a news item?
So much for unbiased reporting. Do we really need personal opinion from Chattahbox “reporters.” Just write up the facts and let it stand, no one needs to know the personal bent of the writer. And I use that term loosely. Most writers read what they write before they post it so they catch typos and other grammatical errors. It has become quite apparent that Chattahbox writers don’t pay much attention to what they write, and are rather opinionated. Just submit the story.
Personally I think everyone has a right to name their child what they wish. Being ordinary is overrated. Unique individuals stand out. They do things differently, and expand themselves. People should strive to be different.
WTF are you talking about eclectico? There is no dissing of the babies name, which by the way is unusual. So whatever ax you have to grind take it somewhere else.
I was referring to the line, “they named him Nakoa-Wolf Manakauapo Namakaeha Momoa!!! Seriously.”
And the obviously derisive tone of this statement, “Jason’s mommy went on to explain the name…”
Almost every write up that I have read on Chattahbox contains dumb typographical errors, and many of the articles are obviously rewritten from other articles found online, with rarely much changed to mask the original source. That last bit can qualify for plagiarism.
If these people are going to call themselves writers they should at least behave like writers and double check their own work, edit any content they receive for publication, or maybe get the gist of a story and present it in their own words, without injecting their own opinion or biases. If Chattahbox wants to develop a decent reputation for having good quality content they need to review what is being published on their site and tighten their standards.
That’s what I’m talking about. And by the way, what’s wrong with unusual?
I agree, there is too much personal bent put into the “news” stories.
I also find it odd that original sources seem to be, the vast amount of the time, never credited.