June 17, 2009
Written by olivia · Filed Under Entertainment
21 Responses to “‘Harry Potter’ Writer JK Rowling Sued For Plagiarism”
The writer who wrote that first book was Nancy Stouffer, Barbara Marcus was the President of Scholastic condemned Stouffer. You should probably change that.
Thank you for catching that. The change has been made.
I don’t believe JK Rowling has done anything to do with copying anyone’s ideas! They have been derived from her own imagination and experiences and if that can’t be accepted well boo-hoo. Harry Potter is and always will be a phenomenonal success and no one will be able to withdraw JK Rowling’s rightful title to this spectacular series in which she wrote and, wrote alone.
a ha ha…
too bad for the person who failed at sueing jk rowling..
imagine writing on scraps of paper when you’re really poor….
yeah… thats how it got started….
you’ve got to know…..
and those people tring to sue her….
stupid for trying to get away with that
I hope she looses the new court case. It’s obvious that it’s stolen as the woman has no writing talent, her other books have failed miserbly, and the only reason Harry Potter became so popular is good marketing.
The women deserves nothing in my books. I do not believe that for one second that she had no prior knowledge of these books.
Just face it JK, you’ve been found out and it’s time to face the music and let down the people who read your terrible books.
Robert – Did you not read the story? Because if you had you would have seen that there were little similarities between the massive 7 book series, and the 36 page Willy the Wizard book.
Fan or not, the people suing are once again out for money, and money alone. They are con artists.
Robert– “her other books have failed miserably” Other books? She hasn’t had anything besides Harry Potter and books relating to Harry Potter published.
I’m not going to say that she’s the best technical writer. But that doesn’t mean she didn’t come up with the ideas for Harry Potter on her own. The claims are ridiculous. I mean, if people are going to sue for every similarity between books, then the Tolkien estate would make a fortune every time someone wrote an elf that was good at archery. Coming up with a wizard train or a wizard competition is not a unique talent. Now if Wally the Wizard had a moon-shaped scar on his forehead, went to a wizard school called Pigzits, had two friends named Robert and Henrietta and was fighting evil Lord Moldywort, then there would be substantial evidence for a reasonable claim.
Oh, for crying out loud.
Once you make millions of dollars on your creativity, people will come out of the woodwork claiming that the “the” in your story is the same as the “the” in their story.
Megan, you’ve said it perfectly.
You people have no idea how much she ‘Borrowed’. It needs to be explained again. If you have 10 million dollars and you hire the TOP LAWYERS in the country you too can steal other peoples work and coutner sue them every time and win. Its the poor person who loses a court battle.
Now on to the evidence. J K (the bitch) borrowed without permission the lightning symbol, the colors, the wizard school, most of the names and even jargon. Go look it up and get a life.
This must be the silliest lawsuit of all time. Even the lawyer’s description of the similarities between the two books seems awfully thin. There is nothing that couldn’t just be a coincidence and there seems to be a great deal of difference in the nature and scope of the books. Does “Moby Dick” plagarize the Bible because they both have a whale and a guy named Ahab? These people are just hoping she will pay them a little something until they go away.
L. Grey http://www.greyorgray.com
you know, some people are really really stupid. Jk has loads of talent, andis incredibly creative. Thanks to her, children acctually wanted to read.
Personally, if any one should be getting sued, its that dumbass christopher paloni. Its like a complete copy of LOTR. Who ever is tolkein’s descedants should be doing some thing about that witless failure. But then their too mature (unliethe retards trying to sue Joanne Rowling)
Robert is right,
Rowling is an idea in your friggin’ head and has likely no existence out of it. Has anybody met her? Does anybody know her? She is about as visible media-wise as camels in Finland. Do you feel you know her the way you know Elizabeth Taylor? Of course not. That is because she is not free to speak. Ad-libbing might be dangerous. She might put her foot in it and give the game away. Best to keep her well away from dangerous reporters asking dangerous questions.
And where is her ‘discoverer” Christopher Little? Come forth Little! Defend your charge! England hath need of thee! Time to stand shoulder to shoulder with your prodigy and face down your assailants.
Nah, another faceless wonder is Little, if facts mean anything. Or is that both these arrogant constructs simply, by happenstance of course, share the misfortune of having the personality of a plastic cup?
Of course, it is plain as dog’s balls to anyone with an IQ of three or more that they are avoiding scrutiny like the blazes. Now why would they do that? That which is honest and true is not afraid of the light , as the good book says. Right? That which is not dwelleth in the darkness. Right? I reckon we will find answers to all that when the Jacobs people get their day in court as is their right …..so that that which hath been hidden so carefully and for so long shall be revealed.
it was fine it was interesting
this is stupid ass shit
i like that she did that
that was awsome how they sued her for $50 million dallars i wish i had $50 million dallars
I call on all Harry Potter fans to demand that their idol Rowling defend her copyright in London’s High Court. If she is innocent what has she got to lose?
Indeed, once she secures victory there she will never have to defend her copyright again or have to call on her foot soldiers to wage war on her behalf on the back of ‘precedents’ and similar nonsense that has quite recently glutted the net. Go for it Joanne! You owe it to your fans.
The difference between ‘borrowing’ and plagiarism?
You ‘BORROW’ -you acknowledge your source preferably with their permission. Or you wise up and give up in that order and do something else.
You “PLAGIARISE” – you do not acknowledge your source. You go on stealing. You never wise up and you never give up. You hide; and hire legal muscle such as the notorious Schillings to frighten off people who threaten to unmask you. Rowling and Little have been living like this for well over a decade. I reckon they have met their Waterloo with this Jacobs trial. No doubt about it.
Really, Matthew? Did you know that “The Adventures Of Willy The Wizard No 1: Livid Land” is only 40 pages long? And that the claims being made are generalizations? And that the lawsuit is being brought by family members of the estate, with source bragging to anyone who will listen that it is a “billion dollar case”? To be honest, I think it is much more likely that these are people looking to make some big bucks and found a platform to run their case.
I like your post on “‘Harry Potter’ Writer JK Rowling Sued For Plagiarism”
Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.
Email Address (required)
Speak your mind
Copyright © 2007 - 2015 ChattahBox News Blog