You ‘BORROW’ -you acknowledge your source preferably with their permission. Or you wise up and give up in that order and do something else.

You “PLAGIARISE” – you do not acknowledge your source. You go on stealing. You never wise up and you never give up. You hide; and hire legal muscle such as the notorious Schillings to frighten off people who threaten to unmask you. Rowling and Little have been living like this for well over a decade. I reckon they have met their Waterloo with this Jacobs trial. No doubt about it.

Indeed, once she secures victory there she will never have to defend her copyright again or have to call on her foot soldiers to wage war on her behalf on the back of ‘precedents’ and similar nonsense that has quite recently glutted the net. Go for it Joanne! You owe it to your fans.

And where is her ‘discoverer” Christopher Little? Come forth Little! Defend your charge! England hath need of thee! Time to stand shoulder to shoulder with your prodigy and face down your assailants.

Nah, another faceless wonder is Little, if facts mean anything. Or is that both these arrogant constructs simply, by happenstance of course, share the misfortune of having the personality of a plastic cup?

Of course, it is plain as dog’s balls to anyone with an IQ of three or more that they are avoiding scrutiny like the blazes. Now why would they do that? That which is honest and true is not afraid of the light , as the good book says. Right? That which is not dwelleth in the darkness. Right? I reckon we will find answers to all that when the Jacobs people get their day in court as is their right …..so that that which hath been hidden so carefully and for so long shall be revealed.

Personally, if any one should be getting sued, its that dumbass christopher paloni. Its like a complete copy of LOTR. Who ever is tolkein’s descedants should be doing some thing about that witless failure. But then their too mature (unliethe retards trying to sue Joanne Rowling)