Comments on: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law

By: Supreme Court May Strike Down Fec Campaign Finance Law …

Supreme Court May Strike Down Fec Campaign Finance Law … — Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:11:27 +0000

[...] (ChattahBox)—An FEC campaign finance case involving a highly critical documentary about Rodham Hillary Clinton, may be responsible for the overturning of a.Next Page [...]

By: Supreme Court May Strike Down Fec Campaign Finance Law …

Supreme Court May Strike Down Fec Campaign Finance Law … — Sun, 04 Oct 2009 20:26:14 +0000

[...] (ChattahBox)—An FEC campaign finance case involving a highly critical documentary about Rodham Hillary Clinton, may be responsible for the overturning of a.Continue [...]

By: ram

ram — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 07:06:31 +0000

corporations may be misuse the elections by means of elections…

By: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law … « Tips

Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law … « Tips — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 00:22:40 +0000

[...] Read more here: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Camp&#… [...]

By: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law … « Best Finance School

Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:20:30 +0000

[...] View original post here: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law … [...]

By: GlfBook - Financial News Daily » Blog Archive » Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law …

Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:53:05 +0000

[...] more here: Supreme Court May Strike Down FEC Campaign Finance Law … Tags: business, campaign, campaign-finance, curiosity, election, entertainment, Finance, [...]

By: Old Man Dotes

Old Man Dotes — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 16:02:52 +0000

Corporations do not HAVE the right to freedom of speech. Corporations are “fictitious persons” who are effectively immortal; allowing them to exercise political freedom of speech gives them undue influence on the course of the nation, which harms the rights and interests of natural persons.

Now, if a law is passed requiring the dissolution and liquidation of corporations 75 years after they are incorporated, with no provision for an extension, then an only then should they be considered to be on an equal footing with natural persons, and then and only then should they be allowed to engage in political speech.