<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin: If President, &#8220;Department of Law&#8221; Blocks Ethics Allegations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/</link>
	<description>When There&#039;s News, Get Ready For Lots Of Chattah!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 May 2012 19:07:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin on NY 9/11 Trials: Atrocious,’ Calls to ‘Hang ‘Em High’ &#124; ChattahBox News Blog</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-36589</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin on NY 9/11 Trials: Atrocious,’ Calls to ‘Hang ‘Em High’ &#124; ChattahBox News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2009 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-36589</guid>
		<description>[...] who once claimed that the White House has a Department of Law, believes our criminal system is not up to the task of prosecuting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who once claimed that the White House has a Department of Law, believes our criminal system is not up to the task of prosecuting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-32014</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-32014</guid>
		<description>Can anyone real tell me that you were impressed by her exit speech? You can’t real believe that she is the only person that can win in 2012.   You know, if she can’t take a joke, don’t get in the game, its politics, they all get kicked around.  Let me paint you a picture, in my opinion, for the last eight years where the mantra was no regulation and no oversight and spread to all federal agencies and the justice department was filled by unqualified religious types and the dullard (ex-drunk) religious president started two wars of choice with extreme tax dollar spending, is anyone surprised with our current economic situation because of those choices.  Sure “W” sucker the religious right to vote for him and that’s why he placed unqualified people in positions of responsibility and they failed (almost a “plan to fail”), do you forget Katrina, where the Director of FEMA Michael D. Brown, was relieved of his duties because of incompetence?  Or can you forget disgraced White House correspondent James Guckert, AKA Jeff Gannon, the male escort, why was a male escort getting into the Whitehouse, hmmm? I know it was Barney Frank’s fault, he controls the county and republicans had their hands tied (even though 7 of the last 8 years they had the majority and the presidency to do something (fact or fiction?), but not the will to act).  Oh, by the way I read that God blog, very funny, it reminds me of those TV evangelists who claim the talk to God and want so and so foreign country leader to be killed or such and such a us state to be punished by God for a court ruling that intelligent design is just another word for religion.  We had enough of religious dullards in our government.  If you believe that the USA has strayed from God then go out to your communities and preach to your neighbors, the sick, the shut ins, the poor and invite them to take part in your church, build a community.  But I know that’s hard work we want a government official to do that for us, well they tried that and look where it left us, in the gutter, but our country does not quit and we will rise again.  Do you remember how Ronald Reagan got us out of a recession? By spending and we will do the same.  But she is just another “W” in heels and she is stringing the religious right along, she will sell you her books, her radio/TV shows and speaking engagements.  Lastly, I do not want you to believe what I believe, so please keep writing, feel free, I am starting to enjoy this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can anyone real tell me that you were impressed by her exit speech? You can’t real believe that she is the only person that can win in 2012.   You know, if she can’t take a joke, don’t get in the game, its politics, they all get kicked around.  Let me paint you a picture, in my opinion, for the last eight years where the mantra was no regulation and no oversight and spread to all federal agencies and the justice department was filled by unqualified religious types and the dullard (ex-drunk) religious president started two wars of choice with extreme tax dollar spending, is anyone surprised with our current economic situation because of those choices.  Sure “W” sucker the religious right to vote for him and that’s why he placed unqualified people in positions of responsibility and they failed (almost a “plan to fail”), do you forget Katrina, where the Director of FEMA Michael D. Brown, was relieved of his duties because of incompetence?  Or can you forget disgraced White House correspondent James Guckert, AKA Jeff Gannon, the male escort, why was a male escort getting into the Whitehouse, hmmm? I know it was Barney Frank’s fault, he controls the county and republicans had their hands tied (even though 7 of the last 8 years they had the majority and the presidency to do something (fact or fiction?), but not the will to act).  Oh, by the way I read that God blog, very funny, it reminds me of those TV evangelists who claim the talk to God and want so and so foreign country leader to be killed or such and such a us state to be punished by God for a court ruling that intelligent design is just another word for religion.  We had enough of religious dullards in our government.  If you believe that the USA has strayed from God then go out to your communities and preach to your neighbors, the sick, the shut ins, the poor and invite them to take part in your church, build a community.  But I know that’s hard work we want a government official to do that for us, well they tried that and look where it left us, in the gutter, but our country does not quit and we will rise again.  Do you remember how Ronald Reagan got us out of a recession? By spending and we will do the same.  But she is just another “W” in heels and she is stringing the religious right along, she will sell you her books, her radio/TV shows and speaking engagements.  Lastly, I do not want you to believe what I believe, so please keep writing, feel free, I am starting to enjoy this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31922</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 18:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31922</guid>
		<description>Who would you chose to get a surgery from a person who worked hard and received an Ivy League education, or one who does not care about education (especially science) and drifts and somehow manages to get a degree.  She showed her true character, by quitting (cut and run) just like her college years.  She couldn’t even give a decent exit speech (her railing against the media was sweet until she ask them to go with her on a fishing trip to clarify her “Rambling Rose” comments).  She was right for Alaska (with a population of less than 700,000), and her education matches it (journalism degree from the University of Idaho in 1987).  But if you think and anyone who wants to get our country back on track after the fiasco of the last administration with our economy and the fabricated two wars then you along with the republican party are completely lost (are you surprise about the election results?).  For the previous eight years we put up with a dullard president, but no more, you may try in 2012 but our eyes are open.    I have heard that Republicans lost because God was against them, I can only say look at the candidates the Republican party put forward on their national ticket and don’t make the same mistake again.  Mavericks, please, more like flash over substance (she quit and he fumbled) and the majority of voters saw it.  We both know that she is cashing out, book deal, a show (Radio/TV), speaking engagements, she will keep her followers as long as she keeps the possibility open for running in 2012.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who would you chose to get a surgery from a person who worked hard and received an Ivy League education, or one who does not care about education (especially science) and drifts and somehow manages to get a degree.  She showed her true character, by quitting (cut and run) just like her college years.  She couldn’t even give a decent exit speech (her railing against the media was sweet until she ask them to go with her on a fishing trip to clarify her “Rambling Rose” comments).  She was right for Alaska (with a population of less than 700,000), and her education matches it (journalism degree from the University of Idaho in 1987).  But if you think and anyone who wants to get our country back on track after the fiasco of the last administration with our economy and the fabricated two wars then you along with the republican party are completely lost (are you surprise about the election results?).  For the previous eight years we put up with a dullard president, but no more, you may try in 2012 but our eyes are open.    I have heard that Republicans lost because God was against them, I can only say look at the candidates the Republican party put forward on their national ticket and don’t make the same mistake again.  Mavericks, please, more like flash over substance (she quit and he fumbled) and the majority of voters saw it.  We both know that she is cashing out, book deal, a show (Radio/TV), speaking engagements, she will keep her followers as long as she keeps the possibility open for running in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin Makes Her Dumbest Comment Ever - Page 2 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31857</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin Makes Her Dumbest Comment Ever - Page 2 - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31857</guid>
		<description>[...] Originally Posted by Robert_Santurri   Sarah Palin: If President, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Originally Posted by Robert_Santurri   Sarah Palin: If President,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin: Raising the bar in stupidity once again - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31856</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin: Raising the bar in stupidity once again - US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 03:12:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31856</guid>
		<description>[...] Palin: Raising the bar in stupidity once again    Sarah Palin: If President, </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Palin: Raising the bar in stupidity once again    Sarah Palin: If President,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Benito</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31840</link>
		<dc:creator>Benito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31840</guid>
		<description>When she accepted the VP nomination, she knew she needed to bring her professional game up to another level, she never did.  She knew that her family would get attacked as did Hilary and Chelsea before her (by even her twin maverick brother McCain in 1998), let face it she knew her family affairs would come out.  But now she plays the victim card again, a card she played after those comical first extended interviews that we all enjoyed and SNL immortalized.  But for the icing on the cake, she quits, because she does not want to be a lame duck governor, because the lawsuits keep coming, because it was the media’s fault, because seeing Russia from her house finally got to her, because its not fair that Alaskan’s paid her salary while she was running for the VP position, take your pick.  So what does she tells us?  Dear Mr. President, when things get tough, quit.  Dear military men and women, if you are not having fun, quit.  Dear son or daughter, if things are not going your way, quit.  Sure, I agree when she first was introduced and gave a descent speech, sure the polls went up, but after the extended interviews, they went where they ended, down.  She showed her true character, I real hope the book deal, Radio/ TV shows and the lecture circuits make up for what her party has lost by her actions. She may go down in history as the quitter that twittered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When she accepted the VP nomination, she knew she needed to bring her professional game up to another level, she never did.  She knew that her family would get attacked as did Hilary and Chelsea before her (by even her twin maverick brother McCain in 1998), let face it she knew her family affairs would come out.  But now she plays the victim card again, a card she played after those comical first extended interviews that we all enjoyed and SNL immortalized.  But for the icing on the cake, she quits, because she does not want to be a lame duck governor, because the lawsuits keep coming, because it was the media’s fault, because seeing Russia from her house finally got to her, because its not fair that Alaskan’s paid her salary while she was running for the VP position, take your pick.  So what does she tells us?  Dear Mr. President, when things get tough, quit.  Dear military men and women, if you are not having fun, quit.  Dear son or daughter, if things are not going your way, quit.  Sure, I agree when she first was introduced and gave a descent speech, sure the polls went up, but after the extended interviews, they went where they ended, down.  She showed her true character, I real hope the book deal, Radio/ TV shows and the lecture circuits make up for what her party has lost by her actions. She may go down in history as the quitter that twittered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Palin&#8217;s National Stumble Doesn&#8217;t Phase GOP Voters, But Independent Support Nosedives &#124; ChattahBox News Blog</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31837</link>
		<dc:creator>Palin&#8217;s National Stumble Doesn&#8217;t Phase GOP Voters, But Independent Support Nosedives &#124; ChattahBox News Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 18:01:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31837</guid>
		<description>[...] back-to-back media interviews on Tuesday, Palin left open the possibility of a future run for president. “…I can’t predict what the next fish [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] back-to-back media interviews on Tuesday, Palin left open the possibility of a future run for president. “…I can’t predict what the next fish [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah Palin: If President, “Department of Law” Blocks Ethics &#8230; &#171; Ethics</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31822</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah Palin: If President, “Department of Law” Blocks Ethics &#8230; &#171; Ethics</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31822</guid>
		<description>[...] Ori&#173;gi&#173;nal&#173; p&#173;os&#173;t: Sar&#173;ah&#173; Palin: If Pr&#173;e&#173;side&#173;nt&#173;, “De&#173;par&#173;t&#173;m&#173;&amp;#1... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ori&#173;gi&#173;nal&#173; p&#173;os&#173;t: Sar&#173;ah&#173; Palin: If Pr&#173;e&#173;side&#173;nt&#173;, “De&#173;par&#173;t&#173;m&#173;&amp;#1&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MDA</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31820</link>
		<dc:creator>MDA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 04:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31820</guid>
		<description>Palin actually debuted the &quot;Law Department&quot; on Friday 7/3, but no one seemed to pick it up.  She said it and she posted it on her website.  In her 7/3 remarks the &quot;Law Department&quot; is the Supreme Court.  Excerpt from Palin&#039;s 7/3 speech:

&quot;Another accomplishment -- our Law Department protected states’ rights -- two huge U.S. Supreme Court reversals came down against that liberal Ninth Circuit, deciding in our state’s favor over the last two weeks.  We’re protectors of our Constitution -- federalists protect states’ rights as mandated in 10th amendment.&quot;

http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php

Paul Begala&#039;s great post:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/sarah-palin-turns-pro_b_225633.html

Her speech was not off the cuff.  Palin wrote it herself and posted it word for word on her website just as the press conference was starting.  She read the speech into a portable, mobile teleprompter.  Greta&#039;s show posted enough video that it included pan back shots showing the teleprompter Palin read into, with a camera on either side of the teleprompter.  Paul Begala&#039;s take at HuffPo on her posted text is priceless, with all of its various ALL CAPS and exclamation points and odd punctuation.  Her rambling syntax was planned, and all the more frightening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Palin actually debuted the &#8220;Law Department&#8221; on Friday 7/3, but no one seemed to pick it up.  She said it and she posted it on her website.  In her 7/3 remarks the &#8220;Law Department&#8221; is the Supreme Court.  Excerpt from Palin&#8217;s 7/3 speech:</p>
<p>&#8220;Another accomplishment &#8212; our Law Department protected states’ rights &#8212; two huge U.S. Supreme Court reversals came down against that liberal Ninth Circuit, deciding in our state’s favor over the last two weeks.  We’re protectors of our Constitution &#8212; federalists protect states’ rights as mandated in 10th amendment.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php?referer=');">http://www.gov.state.ak.us/exec-column.php</a></p>
<p>Paul Begala&#8217;s great post:  <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/sarah-palin-turns-pro_b_225633.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/sarah-palin-turns-pro_b_225633.html?referer=');">http://www.huffingtonpost.com/paul-begala/sarah-palin-turns-pro_b_225633.html</a></p>
<p>Her speech was not off the cuff.  Palin wrote it herself and posted it word for word on her website just as the press conference was starting.  She read the speech into a portable, mobile teleprompter.  Greta&#8217;s show posted enough video that it included pan back shots showing the teleprompter Palin read into, with a camera on either side of the teleprompter.  Paul Begala&#8217;s take at HuffPo on her posted text is priceless, with all of its various ALL CAPS and exclamation points and odd punctuation.  Her rambling syntax was planned, and all the more frightening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Mangold</title>
		<link>http://chattahbox.com/us/2009/07/07/sarah-palin-if-president-department-of-law-blocks-ethics-allegations/comment-page-1/#comment-31818</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Mangold</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 03:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://chattahbox.com/?p=7909#comment-31818</guid>
		<description>Its a disgrace to human kind the way you folks throw crap as though slinging it is what  your life depends on.  When the liberals speak of peace, love and unity, I&#039;m sure I&#039;m not familiar with this brand.  

You people don&#039;t even know this person, Sarah Palin.  Yet your ceaseless attacks make you feel good. 

goody for you!  

Love and compassion will save you, if you can muster up the courage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its a disgrace to human kind the way you folks throw crap as though slinging it is what  your life depends on.  When the liberals speak of peace, love and unity, I&#8217;m sure I&#8217;m not familiar with this brand.  </p>
<p>You people don&#8217;t even know this person, Sarah Palin.  Yet your ceaseless attacks make you feel good. </p>
<p>goody for you!  </p>
<p>Love and compassion will save you, if you can muster up the courage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
