Palin Abused Her Power for Private Gain: New Ethics Charge
July 22, 2009
Comments
5 Responses to “Palin Abused Her Power for Private Gain: New Ethics Charge”
Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.
Totally misleading report…thanks for revealing your liberal bias
1) No “official” finding has been found on the legal defense fund…the report by Daniel was preliminary and was leaked ..never meant for public consumption..(which in itself is a violation of state laws) before any official charges or conclusions were reached or communciated by the Alaska Govt Personnel board
2) The Branchflower democratic committee led findings on Wooten were later rebutted and dismissed by the official state investigative body (Alaska Personnel board) ..so nothing ever came of that smear attempt.
In order for Palin to be found guilty of violating the ethics act of Alaska (that she hereslf helped define and pass)…they would have to prove that there was personal gain in exchange for politica favors or benefit to private parties from state owned resources..ie, “pay to play” schemes. Good luck trying to prove that from a fund were no money was ever withdrawn and whose donors were capped at $150 per donation and not allowed to be state contractors or others that could benefit in “pay to play”
Pls stop with repeating and publishing Palin smear attempts by the left…it;s really sooo yesterday
‘In contrast, Governor Palin is able to generate donations because of the fact that she is a public official and a public figure. Were it not for the fact that she is governor and a national political figure, it is unlikely that many citizens would donate money to her legal defense fund,” added Daniel.”
Hillary Clinton will have to be charged too: Were it not for the fact that she is a national political figure, it is unlikely that many citizens would donate money to pay off her campaign debts.
This charge against Palin is even sillier than the others have been. I will bet a million to one that the “independent investigator” voted for Obama.
Back in September 2008, we saw her wagging her finger that Hillary Clinton, that Hillary should not whine about tough media coverage, she was not doing women any good, she should just plow through it, she should have known what she was getting into and should just try harder and prove herself. “WOW”, I guess she loves measuring others by standards that she does not follow. What a hypocrite, but expected from most political false prophets types. Now we see that she attempted used her official position for personal gain, this is too sweet. Thank you Sarah, great job.
Strange bedfellows – Sarah Palin and scientologist John Coale, Greta Van Susteren’s (Fox News) lawyer husband advised Palin to start her legal legal defense fund . Whats up with that?
Palin and her family are nothing but grifters. Most of the donations (60% or more) are small amount from middle class folks who believe in her. She is taking advantage of those whom she claims to epitomize. They will take from the rich and poor alike and then claim it is a gift from God.
I thank that Lord that our prayers were answered, and we were delivered from “false prophets who preach doom and hatred!”