Global Warming Causing Alarming Glacier Meltdown
August 8, 2009
Comments
11 Responses to “Global Warming Causing Alarming Glacier Meltdown”
Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.
Global warming is a government facade. WHomever runs this site and writes the news hasn’t done their history reading on climates going back to medieval times and the direct correlation with solar activity. In other words this is a bogus sham and it will begin to cool when this solar activity subsides.
Do you believe breathing mammals expunging CO2 is bad? This site is a joke.
As noted above about the medieval warm period, there have been mines found in Alps after some glaciers retreated. If the trend today has everything to do with CO2 and not natural variation then why was there no ice in this area before?
The only “scientific” proof that has been put forth for man made global warming has been “its getting warmer” (which it stopped getting warmer about 12 years ago) and “there is more CO2 in the air”. All the other papers and research is snake oil.
if u wait till its to late… its too late.
obviously depending upon fossil fuels is … foolish.
Can’t believe some people still don’t take global warming seriously. The planet has been getting hotter and that’s a fact. Denying of the fact is utter ignorance and a shame.
A@ BS – So burning all the oil and coal in the world over the next 100 years (as planned) won’t raise the temp of the earth one bit? Water freezes at 32 degrees F and melts at 33. All its takes is a little change to make a HUGE impact.
Last time I had a fever I felt miserable. My temp was 101. Normal is 98.6, death occurs at 104… so only 2.4 degrees can send a human into misery. Do you think anything may happen if earth temps do rise?
People build green houses for a reason, to keep plants warm during cold times. There is no need for humans to build an artificial green house.
Dinosaurs died for a reason… lets not repeat it by digging up and burning them.
In the Little Ice Age glaciers destroyed mountain villages in the Alps and priests were enlisted to try and stop their progress by divine intervention. The 17th century was particularly devastating with much loss of life, decline of agriculture and widespread starvation. This is a matter of historical record and easily found.
By 1860 the Little Ice Age was ending and glaciers retreated on a massive scale . By 1900 many glaciers had receded more than two kilometers in just forty years. I wonder what the headline writers would have said back then, or what the blogosphere would have been like.
A good reference on the little Ice Age is Fagan 1999 chapter on LIA “Floods, Famines, and Emperors: El Niño and the Fate of Civilizations” (Basic Books, 1999).
Bush cost us 8 years of progress on climate change. And there are still those in denial out there, incredible. There is a related post at http://iamsoannoyed.com/?page_id=588
[...] of worldwide hunger, drought, flooding and political unrest. A recent government report shows that glaciers are melting and receding at an alarming [...]
People living in states that depend on glacial meltwater for drinking and irrigation better wise up…fast. Instead of spending money on green this or that, or on expensive energy alternatives to cheap oil and coal, they should spend their money in the search for alternative sources of water.
We need alternative sources of water more than alternative sources of energy.
Adaptation will serve us all much better than any attempts to switch to alternative sources of energy… whether or not manmade CO2 emissions are causing the glaciers to melt.
And the Indians say the exact opposite.
http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008200908090931.htm
Why must scientists always use “proxies”? Why can’t they measure ALL the glaciers? They might come up with different results. Instead they look at the three that are melting and say it’s happening to all of them. That’s not science. It’s junk science.
MrC