The father was not an everyday dad so the choices that kids make are sometimes indirectly your fault fore being a man that is not present on a regular basis.

TV, RADIO, and the internet have such an impact on children and adults of today, the young boy being curious, the father becoming a gangster, and etc. He may have been the boys father but the child was not his property to judge and sentence in a way that would end his future.

The allegation that she was calling him in with a lie to get him to ‘clean his room’ is utterly ridiculous. The fact that your mind would go there is disturbing. As for charging her with the same crime, that is also ridiculous. There was no way she could have known that the father would do something so extreme and kill their son.

As for his comment to his mother, I doubt he was ‘bragging’. He was probably 1. caught, or 2. genuinely terrified and remorseful of his impulses, and reaching out for help before he continued. It doesn’t make it right, certainly, but it was not te job of the father to execute him. We have laws for a reason, and citizen-spurred revenge killings have no place in a civilized society.

If in fact the boy did confess to inappropriate touching, and it did occur, they were both fully clothed, so it really wouldn’t seem to require a death sentence. And it’s kind of hard to believe he’d brag to his mother about it. I mean really, think about it. If all this did occur, why would you call the father and not the police? The mother should be charge with the same crime as the father since her intent was obvious.