Scott Brown, Right-Wing Nut: Smeared Obama as Born Out of Wedlock

January 17, 2010


Comments

17 Responses to “Scott Brown, Right-Wing Nut: Smeared Obama as Born Out of Wedlock”

  1. Steve Weston on January 17th, 2010 3:26 pm

    Gee, it’s funny how the “quoted” article doesn’t exactly match the video. But who cares about the truth as long as you get a democrat elected, right?

  2. Bob on January 17th, 2010 3:33 pm

    F*** you, you left wing Obama *%$@ **&#$*

  3. Cyndy on January 17th, 2010 3:58 pm

    Actually… Michelle Obama said BO’s mom had him when she was VERY single. Came during a roundtable appearance at the University of Missouri in June, 2008.

    “Barack saw his mother, who was very young and very single when she had him, and he saw her work hard to complete her education and try to raise he and his sister,” Michelle Obama said.

    Good to check your facts before repeating a rumor… Just sayin’…

  4. Don on January 17th, 2010 4:01 pm

    The only nut is the idiot who wrote this article. Scott Brown was defending Bristol Palin by asking why the loony lefties were so upset about a young girl having a baby. He said that even Barrack Obama was born to an 18 year old woman. The interviewer than said “Yeah but his parents were married” as if to defend Barrack, and Scott brown laughingly admitted that he didn’t know whether or not they were married. Now you twist these words to suggest that he was trying to disqualify Barrack as a candidate? And then you jump your loony left feet into the conclusion that he is a birther?
    Wow you are pathetically desperate….LOL

  5. Joseph McCarty on January 17th, 2010 4:08 pm

    Scott Brown was defending Palin against the sexism and hypocrisy of the Democrat Party’s attacks on her. The woman on the left seems to think that it was OK for Obama’s parents to have had him at a young age, but that Bristol Palin had bad moral value because she did the same thing, and then since Sarah Palin is Bristol’s mother that Sarah Palin is bad as well. Brown called her on her hypocrisy and all she could come up with was that Obama’s parents were married. Ridiculous. Now you are calling him a birther because he is against sexism? what a strange thing to do.

    Dr. Joseph McCarty

  6. me on January 17th, 2010 4:44 pm

    article written by sue whom pls? just so i can add the name to my list of bought ‘n paid for, or equally likely simply stupid, so-called journalists :)

  7. Bryan on January 17th, 2010 5:58 pm

    Whoever wrote this article should be forced to not write another piece on politics for some time as a punishment for their ignorance and vain attempt to make Brown seem like a nut. Just because the guy says that he doesn’t know whether Obama’s mother was married or not and then laughs (quite sheepishly by the way, not demeaning) doesn’t make him crazy. Just so everybody knows…his parents married February 2nd. He was born August 4th. That almost exactly 6 months, or 24 weeks, after they were married. Now, for all of you that don’t know. An average pregnancy is 40 weeks, or 9 months. That means that they probably got married because she was knocked up with little Barack, or he was born a very premature baby. The dates are available in his book and one a ton of online sources.

  8. Matt on January 17th, 2010 7:54 pm

    Typical attack posture of the democrats. Can’t beat em fairly, just lie. Any intelligent person who viewed the entire segment clearly gets that Brown simply said “Well I don’t know about that” you know meaning “I don’t know about that”…. Hope the whole party goes down in the flames from the fires they continue to set. Keep making crap up.

  9. dennisintn on January 17th, 2010 9:40 pm

    just another eample of chicago/sol alinsky style political rhetoric. the dems don’t even bother making their lies believable anymore.
    ddnnisintn

  10. Dale DuBois on January 18th, 2010 3:53 am

    Obama and his thugs are on their way out and the people who think he’s just great will be eating crow before long. Obama is just a muslim implant to do away with our constitution. He supports terrorist and used terrorist money to get elected.

  11. XCOwboy2 on January 18th, 2010 12:19 pm

    Obama was born on August 4th
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obama

    His parents were married on February 2nd.

    YOU do the math.

    He was conceived out of wedlock and his parents married before he was born.

  12. Gary on January 18th, 2010 3:16 pm

    Obama was indeed born out of wedlock.

    In fact, Obama, Sr, who served as little more than a sperm donor, was still married, and with many Children back in Kenya, when he and Stanley Ann Dunham hooked up.

    These are basic facts that even Obama himself does not deny.

    I’ll leave it to the law to decide if Ann and Obama Sr we ever actually, and legally married, but at the time he was born, they most certainly were not.

    Another Epic Fail by the loony left.

    BTW, how about this Scott Brown, the new Senator from the great state of Massachusetts!

    One of just many more Conservative victories to come!

  13. Scott Brown Smirks At Coakley Slur: ‘Shove a Curling Iron Up Her Butt’ | ChattahBox News Blog on January 18th, 2010 9:22 pm

    [...] campaigning. In reality, Coakley has simply uncovered Brown’s unseemly voting record and media appearances. As Brown whined about malicious tactics, his supporters started [...]

  14. Sallie Parker on January 18th, 2010 11:59 pm

    Let’s not get carried away with irrelevancies. Barack Obama Sr and Ann Dunham may or may not have been married when Barack Jr was born; it’s a side issue, and Brown was merely finessing it. I do not know of any controversy over the legitimacy of that marriage nor have I seen any evidence that the marriage took place. It’s a non-issue. If we accept for sake of argument that the marriage took place, we still have the brutal fact that the junior Obama does not look like the putative father, which suggests that if the marriage took place when they said it did, it was merely a marriage of convenience when Ann Dunham was already pregnant.

  15. Mad Scramble to Get Out Vote for Martha Coakley to Stop Brown Teabagger Win | ChattahBox News Blog on January 19th, 2010 3:35 pm

    [...] U.S. Senate race, there is the very real possibility that former Cosmo nude model and teapartier right-wing Republican candidate Scott Brown, may win the election. What? Not in Massachusetts you say. Two-months ago no [...]

  16. Kevin James on January 20th, 2010 10:00 am

    Welcome to the start of the second American revolution and not a single life was lost as far as I know. The right wing radical socialist agenda is crumbling. The people of Massachusetts, fittingly the birthplace of our freedom and independence, have sent a message to Washington. Socialism doesn’t work… just ask Russia. What a major blow to Obama and the rest of his cronies’ smug and arrogant attitudes. That’s what you get when you forget that you are there to serve the American people. You were elected to uphold the Constitution and preserve our freedoms… not take them away. We’re fed up and we’re not going to take it anymore! Start packing your bags. That useless slug Deval is next!

  17. Hey Dems: ‘Grow a Pair’ With Balls Beer and Pass Healthcare | ChattahBox News Blog on January 23rd, 2010 8:53 am

    [...] Democrats have just had a Terrible, Horrible, No Good, Very Bad WEEK. The shocking win of right-wing teapartier Scott Brown in Massachusetts, stripping the Senate of the filibuster-proof 60 member majority, led [...]

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.