Rep. Cantor: Attacks Dems as ‘Reprehensible,’ ‘Reckless’ Using ‘Threats as Political Weapons’

March 25, 2010


Comments

3 Responses to “Rep. Cantor: Attacks Dems as ‘Reprehensible,’ ‘Reckless’ Using ‘Threats as Political Weapons’”

  1. Old Man Dotes on March 25th, 2010 4:03 pm

    ‘Cantor also revealed that he was directly threatened this week, when a bullet was shot through the window of his Richmond campaign office.’

    It’s damn shame it didn’t hit him in the testicles.

  2. Anne on March 26th, 2010 8:54 am

    In keeping with the hypocrisy that the GOP is becoming all too well known for, Cantor totally ignores the inflammatory rhetoric that has been thrown around all year in inciting hatred toward Barack Obama. Some of this has come from Republican politicians, which in turn has encouraged ordinary citizens–including many in the Tea Party. I don’t like to see anyone victimized by violence, regardless of their political affiliations. That said, the GOP has sown the wind and reaped the whirlwind by tolerating, and in some ways encouraging, the very worst elements of the Teabaggers. Some, like Bachmann, were encouraging them the day that Congressmen were called the N-word and one was spat on.
    In addition, another one was called the F-word. The fact that people nearby witnessed this behavior is enough, and it’s a fabrication that anyone would make these things up to discredit the Tea Party. They do a good job with that on their own.

  3. Entertainment Non Stop – Jennifer Aniston, Brad Pitt and Angelina … | Brad Pitt Celebrity Monitor on March 27th, 2010 11:40 pm

    [...] Rep. Cantor: Attacks Dems as 'Reprehensible,' 'Reckless' Using … [...]

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.