Sen. Vitter: Rachel Maddow Looked Like a Woman a ‘Long Time Ago’

July 17, 2010


6 Responses to “Sen. Vitter: Rachel Maddow Looked Like a Woman a ‘Long Time Ago’”

  1. sheik camel toe on July 17th, 2010 5:27 pm


    CNN has some real zingers on “Diapers” Vitter!

  2. Mickey Paviol on July 18th, 2010 1:43 am

    It just demonstrates what a small xenophobic world the christianist right wing lives in, where it is politically correct only to talk to other people who look and think as they do. Vitter, Sanford and Ensign aren’t real men, they are chauvinistic, self absorbed, family destroying leeches.

  3. Crass and Low Class Comments « Btx3's Blog on July 18th, 2010 7:22 am

    [...] Sen. Vitter: Rachel Maddow Looked Like a Woman a ‘Long Time Ago’ Rachael Maddow High School Yearbook Pic [...]

  4. Adrian Snare on July 18th, 2010 11:42 pm

    Vitter acts as a two year old. That people elected him, is not a good reflection on them. That he is a Republican says volumes about todays so-called Republicans.
    And I could care less if he frequents prostitutes…..
    If the Democrats are careful and become united, they could be completely swept into office and the conservatives/tea-baggers/libertarians will be out in the cold.

  5. sheik camel toe on July 19th, 2010 1:22 am

    Wait….did I say White Power? I meant……well….White Power! I am a Repuke, ya know! LOL!

  6. sheik camel toe on July 19th, 2010 5:59 pm

    It is very, very difficult for Americans and everyone else to believe that 9-11 was an external terrorist attack.

    When the truth comes out, the World is going to go absolutely APESHIT.

    Hang ‘em high, boys……hang ‘em high.

    There is sooooooooo much info and video posted online that its almost impossible to logically go along with this “theory” anymore.

    Lie lie lie…we die die die. Yay team!

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.