Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming ‘Hoax’

September 28, 2010


Comments

11 Responses to “Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming ‘Hoax’”

  1. Obongo on September 28th, 2010 2:09 pm

    What does chattahbox have to gain by supporting global warming?
    This story is so biased that this so called science is true, as we all know the sun has nothing to do with the climate of earth. Duh.

  2. Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming ‘Hoax’ – ChattahBox : doing-it-green.com on September 28th, 2010 2:32 pm

    [...] Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming 'Hoax'ChattahBoxBut that's not about to stop Issa, because the global warming denier is out to make a big public splash and a name for himself. …Global warming critic plots revengePolitico (blog)all 2 news articles » [...]

  3. » Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming ‘Hoax’ - ChattahBox on September 28th, 2010 3:11 pm

    [...] Conspiratorial GOPers to Investigate Global Warming 'Hoax'ChattahBoxBut that's not about to stop Issa, because the global warming denier is out to make a big public splash and a name for himself. …Global warming critic plots revengePolitico (blog)all 2 news articles » [...]

  4. Ozonator on September 28th, 2010 3:42 pm

    Ignoring reality, from the source of T-GOP “duh” –
    “RUSH: … big, big, big global warming news … who the hell are we to say what’s possible and impossible on the sun?  There’s nobody from here that’s ever been there.  There’s nobody from here that’s ever been close enough to get any kind of idea what’s possible and not possible on the sun.  How many people have the IQ, even the most learned among us, how many have the IQ to understand the physics and the concept of a star like Earth … What kind of vanity do we have that we would dare admit that there are things on the sun that are impossible?” (“Global Warming Update”; Mr. Rush Limbaugh, The Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity Extremist Republican and Christian and other corporate ‘ore media outlets; rushlimbaugh.com, 3/22/07).

  5. Bill Butler on September 28th, 2010 6:06 pm

    “Global Warming Deniers” have constructed a “logical framework” that is “proof” against all challenges. It goes like this:

    “Global Warming Alarmists” are engaged in a politically motivated conspiracy. If research indicates human influence on climate, then the climatologist/scientist who conducted the research fudged the numbers and should be investigated. If an investigation clears the climatologist/scientist of wrongdoing, then it is a whitewash.

  6. jaggedben on September 28th, 2010 6:26 pm

    Obongo, I’d say that by acknowledging the fact of global warming, Chattabox improves its reputation as a reliable source of information.

    Bill Butler, can you explain what how a least squares analysis works? Let me know. If not, I’m probably going to listen to scientists who know how to do math, not you.

  7. Windy City Kid on September 28th, 2010 7:15 pm

    It is interesting that recent discoveries have many from the consensus crowd now reevaluating their religion. For instance Phil Jones who recently had been investigated for his involvement in “climategate” went on BBC and passed these tidbibts on to the BBC audience.

    *”neither the rate nor magnitude of recent warming is exceptional.
    *There was no significant warming from 1998-2009.
    *According to the IPCC we should have seen a global temperature increase of at least 0.2°C per decade.
    *The IPCC models may have overestimated the climate sensitivity for greenhouse gases, underestimated natural variability, or both.
    *This also suggests that there is a systematic upward bias in the impacts estimates based on these models just from this factor alone.
    *The logic behind attribution of current warming to well-mixed man-made greenhouse gases is faulty.
    *The science is not settled, however unsettling that might be.
    *There is a tendency in the IPCC reports to leave out inconvenient findings, especially in the part(s) most likely to be read by policy makers.”

    My question is this. If one of the staunchest supporters of the IPCC AGW theory says the above and also publishes a new peer reviewed paper poking holes in man made CO2 as the sole driver of climate, what would he say under oath? Isn’t this worth exploring before we commit trillions of dollars to something that shows modeled theory diverging from instrument measurement? I see no harm in a confirmation process and certainly this is no conspiracy unless you think Phil Jones Pat Flannery Judith Curry and other climate scientists are now Republican co-conspirators.

  8. Paul Revere on September 28th, 2010 10:40 pm

    We will simply want to make sure there are less control freaks and the kind of tyranny that has been going on since and before the assination of President John F.Kennedy and since President Woodrow Wilson’s time, is much less likely to be arranged so incrementally and smoothly ever again, we still have a long way to go to strain out all of the tyrants, who have caused much grief to families and peoples’ lives already! Their must be justice, for peace to arrive!

    So if you’ve done the crime stop whinning and avoiding the inevitable, and pay the time!

  9. michael jones on September 29th, 2010 12:42 am

    I am shock that at this stage there is still a question over the facts and science of climate change/global warming. I suppose it has something to do with climate control of our buildings and the fact we are far removed from the narural world.
    Saying that, I will but my computer to sleep and turn on the air condition and keep my night light on.
    Oh, this may interest you deniers. The leading bank in Europe, Deutsche Bank, working with Colimbia University examines all the skeptics claims that it was not due to human burning of fossil fuels and concluded it was indeed was and a long term threat.
    Oh, it’s readily on the web if you care to read it.
    I need to go now and go to sleep, I have an overtime shift tow work because O live in Florida and have very expensive hurricane/flood/wind home insurance. It seems that the INSURANCE companies also agree in global warming…when will YOU!?

  10. bachcole on September 29th, 2010 6:09 am

    If Chatterbox would unglue their lips from the backsides of lamestream media and look at the evidence, they might not be quite so biased in their reporting. The public has gotten caught up into a scientific controversy that is usually invisible to the public, but this time everyone is panicked about the possible outcome. The little minds at Chatterbox never heard of Alfred Wegener and his universal slam by science for at least 50 years. But the public did not get involved because drifting continents didn’t seem to be immediately relevant. Scientists are socially and morally retarded and will lie and putdown their intellectual opponents, but this time society as a whole got involved before the facts were settled.

  11. Ozonator on September 30th, 2010 12:07 am

    Now, the T-GOP has US at glove compartment gunpoint and is marching us into the natural cycle of non-racist slavery without ever cracking a book. For example, “Global warming is not science, it’s not been proved in the scientific method.  Another test of whether something is … if it’s predictive.  Can you predict from your knowledge of the science? … Global warming has turned out to not be predictive, either, as we have seen over the last ten years” (the old, ugly and evil Rush “LABI” Limbaugh with Hannity/Noory extremist Republican and Christian outlets for legally killing thy neighbors, SS – Storm Soldier rearing his Pilodinal Cyst Phalanx of willing accomplices and sham brides, EIB coli, baby monitor for Planet-Star Wormwoody Jenkins, Missouri mule screwing anything into the ground for more corporate welfare/healthcare like the US military, planetary ecosystems, and US, trying to harvest more Americans than Esso-Koch, aka Dr. “Jeff ‘Gannon’ Christie”; rushlimbaugh.com, 9/29/10).

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.