Tenn. Firefighters Watch Home Burn Down, Because Family Didn’t Pay Fee

October 4, 2010


Comments

7 Responses to “Tenn. Firefighters Watch Home Burn Down, Because Family Didn’t Pay Fee”

  1. Ziggle on October 4th, 2010 10:06 pm

    The fire department in question is a city fire department. It puts out fires within the city limits as part of its mandate. Why would you hold them responsible for putting out fires outside the city limit for property owners who chose not to pay the fee?

    The homeowner knew that there was a fee due, and chose to take that risk. No difference between that and choosing not to buy homeowner’s insurance or collision insurance on your car. He took a risk, and found out that the result wasn’t worth it. Presumably he’ll be smarter in the future.

  2. Mark on October 4th, 2010 11:48 pm

    First I suspect this guy supports the Tea-party and generally does everything “On the cheap”. I also suspect that the man didn’t have insurance for his home because if he did the insurance company would have required him to pay the fee. The fire company is obligated to rescue people out of the burning house.
    This is like not paying your taxes. What did he think would happen if he didn’t pay the fire fee?

  3. winston on October 5th, 2010 12:07 am

    This is the type of jaded journalism that keeps people in the dark about the truth. The government today has ruin this country – we are in this position today because the “Best” Republicans and Democrats are stealing your money and causing a financial collapse while paid for hacks try and blame it on someone like Ron Paul who has been warning people this would happen for years not.

    Really lame article — get a clue.

  4. MacHead on October 5th, 2010 8:27 am

    The journalist is remiss in calling this Ayn Rand policy. First off, Rand does not advocate libertarians, calling them the hippies of the Right. Second, the government’s purpose is to protect the rights of its citizens- quite contrary to Libertarian policy.

  5. olivia on October 5th, 2010 4:19 pm

    MacHead – I think I can see why this was referred to as an “Ayn Rand” policy, as the point of Objectivism seems to be a policy of the utmost, unregulated, all-for-himself ultra-Capitalism. I think this kind of ridiculous policy applies. After all, Rand’s view was always pretty extreme, as is seen in published works.

  6. VFF on October 6th, 2010 8:46 am

    Government should never be allowed to or excused for dictating human compassion and decency by application of law.

    But, I also say SHAME ON THOSE FIREMEN (and it disgusts me to have to give them that title) for letting any county, city, state or other policy to keep them from doing what any compassionate, decent, honorable person with the proper skills and resources to hand would do and try to put out that fire and save that persons home!

    Being a Fire Fighter is a calling, not a job! If those individuals in the photo, wearing the uniforms of Fire Fighters don’t know that, they dishonor those of us in the present who know and feel the weight of that responsibility, those from the past who have sacrificed their lives in performance of their duties and those who will take our places in the future.

    You sirs and/or madams DISGUST ME and I’m ashamed to see soulless, gutless, worms like you, clothed in a uniform that for centuries has represented, Honor, Service, Self Sacrifice, and Brotherhood.

  7. xrazorwirex on October 6th, 2010 3:44 pm

    Let me get this straight. So when the government screws up it’s the fault of people who are advocating less government and the solution is to have the government become even more pervasive and powerful? It’s completely antithetical.

    Too bad people in Tennessee aren’t free to compete with the government; then somebody might have been able to put out the fire for the compensation that this family offered to pay, but since the government is a violent monopoly it’s just tough luck.

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.