Army Doc Pleads Guilty at Birther Court-Martial, Faces Prison

December 14, 2010


Comments

3 Responses to “Army Doc Pleads Guilty at Birther Court-Martial, Faces Prison”

  1. Morely Dotes on December 14th, 2010 9:59 pm

    The US Army does not need officers who are stupid enough to fall for the “birther” conspiracy theories. If he’s fallen for that, then he’s ripe to be recruited by foreign enemies as well as the domestic enemies he already loves.

  2. Don Olsen on January 3rd, 2011 8:55 am

    What you say is simply not true. Obama has only released a “certificate of live birth” which does not list the birth doctor or the hospital. This document is so easy to get illegally that it was not considered valid in divorce proceedings in Hawaii until 2008. No one disputes that before his inauguration he went to Hawaii and had his real Birth Certificate sealed. Even the Hawaii governor at the time acknowledged this. All Lt. Col. Lankin has asked is that Obama show his sealed Birth Certificate and clear up the issue. Even Obama supporter Chris Matthew has made the same request of Obama but Obama refuses to unseal the document. Very suspicious behavior for the “Commander in Chief”

    I suspect you will censor this comment, since the truth does not seem to be on your agenda.

  3. Alfredo Edwards on May 11th, 2011 12:39 am

    I’m so happy this jack ass got what he wanted. The nerve to question the elected president. I hope he spends a nice six months in jail and a lost of all his benefits.He never question all the former presidents birth certificates for the last 17 years. You talk about blatant racism. Most whites believe in equality in principle but not in practice.

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.