Israel Apologizes for ‘Regrettable Incident,’ Over Biden’s Visit, But U.S. Wants More

March 15, 2010

(ChattahBox)—-Israel’s prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu apologized on Sunday for the international diplomatic snafu with the United States, during Vice President Biden’s visit to the Jewish state last week, but he still plans to continue with Jewish settlements. Right before Biden arrived to mediate the beginning of peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, the government announced plans “to build 1,600 new housing units for Jews” in Arab neighborhoods in East Jerusalem. In response to the news, the Palestinians left the talks before they even began. Biden condemned Israel’s actions and the Obama administration considered the Jewish nation’s behavior, on the eve of scheduled peace talks, an insult.

The U.S. considers Israel’s expansion of Jewish settlements in East Jerusalem to be illegal and the country’s annexation of the area, after the 1967 Mideast war, has not been internationally recognized. Both Israel and the Palestinians claim East Jerusalem as their holy capitol, and neither side is about to give it up:

“The fate of east Jerusalem is the most explosive issue in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. Israel captured the area in the 1967 Mideast war and considers the entire city its capital. Netanyahu has said he will never agree to share control of the holy city.The Palestinians claim the eastern sector — home to sensitive Jewish, Christian and Muslim holy sites — as the capital of a future state that would include the West Bank and Gaza Strip.”

Netanyahu told his Cabinet Sunday that the ill-timed settlement announcement is under investigation and he regrets it, but not enough to stop the Jewish settlement expansion in East Jerusalem. “There was a regrettable incident that was done in all innocence and was hurtful, and which certainly should not have occurred,” Netanyahu said. But he also told his Cabinet, “not to get carried away and to calm down.” “We will act according to the vital interests of the state of Israel,” he said.

The Obama administration viewed Netanyahu’s “regret” as a start in thawing the strained relations between the two governments, but say if Israel was truly apologetic, the nation would resume peace talks in good faith with its neighbors.

White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said the apology was merely a “good start.”



2 Responses to “Israel Apologizes for ‘Regrettable Incident,’ Over Biden’s Visit, But U.S. Wants More”

  1. tahami on March 15th, 2010 2:25 pm

    isreal wants war, for someone to keep stealing land how long to they think they can get away with it, the world needs to do more for the helpless palestinians
    britain and the US need to do much more,

  2. magi on March 15th, 2010 6:11 pm

    Joseph “I have the lowest poll numbers ever in my state”Liebermann has weighed in on the issue now, and of course, he’s blaming the Obama administration for Netanyahu’s actions. What none of the American news networks is telling the American people is that George W. Bush was also in favor of a two-state solution and had made it plain to Israel, and that Obama is following his policies. This is one of many failures on the part of the MSM to keep the public informed. Libermann acted as if his lips had been sealed with superglue on the issue when GWB was in office, but now he’s all mouth. I have only one word to describe Liebermann, and it is coward. It is my firm opinion that no one gets justice when we stand up for the wrong thing. If it’s left up to Liebermann and Netanyahu, America will be pulled into a third war to save Israel’s bacon. It’s good that I’m not POTUS because if I were and Israel began a war expecting U.S. support, it would be on its’ on. And people wonder why Iran wants nuclear weapons.

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.