Man Has Penis Glued To Stomach By Wife, Mistress, 2 Others

August 4, 2009

Wisconsin (ChattahBox) – A man who was lured into a motel room by one of his four mistresses, and found more than he had bargained for.

After agreeing to being tied up, Donessa Davis was shocked to see his wife, mistresses sister, and another woman come out of hiding, and proceed to hit him in the face, taunt him, and glue his penis to his stomach.

According to the women, Davis had been seeing four different women, and had been taking money and sex from each one.

One of the girlfriends had found out from the wife that he was married and seeing other women, and had agreed to a plan to get revenge.

Now, Therese Ziemann, 48, Michelle Belliveau, 43, Therese Ziemann, 48, and Tracy Hood-Davis have been arrested for false imprisonment. Other charges may follow, but they have all currently been released on bail.

While what the women did was certainly wrong, and should not be condoned, it is hard to feel too sorry for Davis.

Not only was be exploiting four women, plus his wife, by having repeated affairs and using them for their money. He was also charged with the repeated sexual assault of a child in 2004, in a case that was named a mistrial after the victims in the case didn’t appear in court.

According to court documents, attempts at making contact with the victims, witnesses, and family members were attempted by deputies on several occasions, but they were unable to find them.

You will have to draw your own conclusions, but I have to admit that I am not shedding tears of sympathy for Mr. Davis, even if these women made rather misguided attempt to avenge their ‘honor’.

Could they have all just left him though?


(Picture belongs to


18 Responses to “Man Has Penis Glued To Stomach By Wife, Mistress, 2 Others”

  1. Margeaux on August 5th, 2009 7:03 am

    All of those involved are a bunch of LOSERS!

    Sleeping with a married man – come on!

    I am sure he was “well-endowed” if they were able to glue his penis to his stomach.

    With beer guts hanging down to their crotch, it’s no wonder these women were able to glue his penis to his stomach.

  2. MTS on August 5th, 2009 1:28 pm

    those gals did wrong… could you imagine the press had four men sexually assaulted a female ?… punishment for violence against the male anatomy should be commensurate with that of rape

  3. Claude McKnight / Take 6 Founder - Page 18 on August 5th, 2009 2:10 pm

    […] Re: Claude McKnight / Take 6 Founder Damn. Sounds like he has a fetish for that. Normally when guys have those taboo things that push them to orgasm, it’s because they are so bored with the norm because they have to constantly search for a new high, like a drug addict or they have had those things actually happen to them in their lives and they are searching for people who will role play the fantasy for them. Weird asses. Some men never learn. Here’s one. I guess this guy messed with the wrong ones! Man Has Penis Glued To Stomach By Wife, Mistress, 2 Others | ChattahBox News Blog […]

  4. LOL on August 6th, 2009 4:16 pm

    I can’t stop laughing LMAO!!!!

  5. lets-be-fair on August 6th, 2009 5:37 pm

    I don’t see any humor in it, at all…. reverse the genders and imagine how the media would present the story… I’m, pretty much, just appalled… particularly at how many in the blogging communities (some) are so quick to dismiss the serious nature of this crime based on their personal emotional commonality with the perpetrators… even if one has been cheated on (and may still be bitter) there simply isn’t a way to justify violence…. no amount of infidelity justifies physical abuse (most definitely not sexual assault / battery)… the victim will suffer with psychological scars as well as physical (akin to rape trauma)… it’s just not right… punishment for violence against the male anatomy should be commensurate with that of rape…. all the media hype opens up a great opportunity for the WI courts to set an example… this behavior is absolutely unacceptable

  6. Merciful on August 8th, 2009 7:18 pm

    No it is not funny, not funny at all. The man deserves everything he got! He brought it all on himself, just like that Claude McKnight of Take6 mentioned above.

  7. lets-be-fair on August 10th, 2009 10:15 am

    well ‘Merciful’ … I guese one could say the same thing about the stripper in the Duke University Lacrosse rape case back in 2006 (except that she was lying)…. blaming the victim (eg he/she ‘deserved it’) still doesn’t make it right

  8. Merciful on August 11th, 2009 11:49 pm

    Sorry, was not blaming the victim…at all.. this blog is a tad confusing…was only saying that men that set out with toxic actions, will only find them selves with toxic reactions…therefore, they have only themselves to blame.

  9. lets-be-fair on August 12th, 2009 3:23 pm

    Merciful…. perhaps you should have written…. “was only saying that PEOPLE that set out with toxic actions, will only find them selves with toxic reactions…therefore, they have only themselves to blame”…. to hide any bias against males… ???… the gals were wrong to take the law into their own hands… until they elevated the situation to violence, it was simply concentual infidelity (both ways)…. apparently these women felt that they were above the law… but even our justice system forbids cruel & unusual punishment… no amount of infidelity justifies physical abuse (most definitely not sexual assault / battery)… the victim will suffer with psychological scars as well as physical (akin to rape trauma)… it’s just not right… punishment for violence against the male anatomy should be commensurate with that of rape

  10. Merciful on August 29th, 2009 8:18 pm

    While I agree with you on the violence part wholeheartedly, his own bad behavior and actions in the first place, brought on all of this. Had he not done what he did, this whole situation would not even exist – In other words, he reaped what he sowed…. No-one’s fault but his own.

    Let me ask you this?? Would you jump into a lions’ den full of lions with a fresh cut of meat? Would you put a flame of a match to your skin on purpose?? No, you wouldn’t because you know it is wrong, right?? When you violate another, or in this case, others on purpose, you really get no say-so on their reactionary behavior .He clearly took the gamble and lost! LOL, not a very smart person at all.

  11. lets-be-fair on September 2nd, 2009 4:17 pm

    Merciful: consensual sex between adults, even infidelity, does not grant either party the right to inflict harm… comments like ‘he reaped what he sowed’ imply that the perpetrators were somehow given authority, beyond the law, to inflict whatever degree of revenge that they saw fit (however cruel, unusual, &/or heinous)… you simply can’t justify away the violent actions… the ladies got their feelings hurt, sure, but that did not give them the right to escalate to violence

  12. Merciful on September 4th, 2009 5:02 am

    His consensual sex party he was enjoying wasn’t consensual if he was leading them to believe each were the only one!! -Then it is not consensual, not at all… that is trickery and when that is used – that is taking away the ladies choices to choose to start with! The ladies got more than their feelings hurt… so, sorry i can not buy that. He ripped them off of their dignity, messed with their emotions, put their physical health in danger and then took money on top that,- further endangering their financial positions- all in the name of sex and deceit – he knew what he was doing!! After being extremely conned these ladies will now suffer from extreme self doubt about themselves for years to come.. In essence he inflicted more damage than you or i can ever know.!! . as i said, i agree with you on the violence part, BUT, no-one and i stress NO-ONE can control the reactions of others, especially when something is done to them intentionally and maliciously … No-one can ever register the reactions of others whom have been severely tricked, conned, deceived and scammed…. NO-ONE !! and that was the risk he took when going into this!! Never mess around another person’s head in the first place-and these things wouldn’t happen! It is as very simple as that…..
    I say..He took a very high risk and as it turned out, he lost!! Awww boo hooo – Whatever his punishment for doing this to others is really what he brought to himself…. There is no-one to blame but himself – really just a very stupid man who could not control his stupid sexual urges…. it is terrible the way he disrespected these women….. and there are becoming more and more men like him out there there every day…..and it needs to stop! I for one, hope he has learned his lesson…. he is in no way at the victim here. Play with fire – you could get burned… Duh!! that is what he chose…. and he got burned -aaaawwwwww poooor man -very simple logic. Don’t do mean things to people and they won’t do mean things to you!! Do unto others… the saying goes.

    Anyway, here is another stupid one that did this on a much grander scale…..

    The disrespect for women is sooooo out of control now it is saaaad – ladies need to start standing up to this crap – it is time!

  13. olivia on September 4th, 2009 9:45 am

    Merciful – Women will CONTINUE to be disrespected as long as thinking like the above is permitted. Yes, it is hard to feel sorry or sympathetic, and I really don’t. But that doesn’t mean his ‘punishment’ was warranted, or acceptable. These women demeaned themselves and their entire gender by becoming vengeful and doing some both abusive (sexually, I might add), and illegal.

    The wife should have divorced him, his girlfriend should have left and sued him for the money, and the two friends should never have gotten involved. We have a system, and it may not always work, but it is there for a reason. Part of that reason is so that ridiculous attempt at vigilante justice are not attempted.

    As for ‘bringing it on himself’, yes, he probably did. However, the wife knew about his years of affairs and she stayed with him, so she brought it on herself. The girlfriend was so desperate that she gave him thousands of dollars, so she probably brought it on herself. How many of his past girlfriends do you think knew he was married? They probably brought it on themselves.

    Please don’t turn these women into poster children for feminism. This is the opposite of what we are looking for.

  14. Let's Be Real on September 6th, 2009 5:04 pm

    If you set out with evil intentions on other people and lie to trick them into a situation, then you’ve brought it all on yourself!! And in general you don’t get any say-so in the other person’s reactions, . Very, very simple. He took that risk – I most certainly agree! No-one is saying that what the women did was right, only that he took that risk in the first place.

  15. lets-be-fair on September 9th, 2009 4:33 pm

    following the line of reasoning that risky behavior begets ‘brought it on himself’ results…. do we dare extend the logic to those that dress / act provocatively and end up getting a little more sexually attention than they planned on (date rape)…. I don’t think so…. but, similarly, this is ‘messing with someone’s emotions’ (Merciful’s words) resulting in ‘NO-ONE can control the reactions of others’ (Merciful’s words’ again) which, according to the logic, should end in ‘Duh!! that is what she chose…. and she got burned -aaaawwwwww poooor woman’….. perhaps this analogy will shift it into perspective for ya (?)

  16. olivia on September 9th, 2009 4:56 pm

    I agree with you, Let-Be-Fair; he did not bring anything on himself by taking a risky behavior. He risked his wife filing for divorce by cheating. He risked being sued by the women he took advantage of. He risked a lot of things. I don’t think having one’s genitals abused is on the list of things he rightfully risked due to his actions.

    Like I said in the article, it is hard to feel sorry for him. He is a cheat, a manipulator, and a horrible man. He is also an accused child sexual abuser. I get that. Still, he didn’t bring anything on himself. but those women sure did.

  17. lets-be-fair on September 10th, 2009 1:27 pm

    olivia – agreed, well stated

  18. Pinda Kaas on April 6th, 2011 2:25 pm

    That’s what vaginas do! vaginas are horrible, nastyt, evil creatures! and flat out GROSS!

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.