List Released of Crimes Oakland Police Won’t Respond to After 80 Let Go

July 14, 2010

originally posted to Flickr as Broken Windows

Lots of broken glass on the sidewalk after the unrest in Oakland caused by BART Police shooting of Oscar Grant. Photo Credit: Daniel Ramirez

California (ChattahBox) – As Oakland becomes increasingly violent, with crimes at an all time high, police are needed more than ever. But RAW has reported that the city has let 80 officers go, and instead they are narrowing the crimes that they will be investigating.

The measure is far from surprising; the state is facing major funding problems that are causing cuts in all public sector jobs, and this is probably only the beginning.

But the police force is attempting to fight on with limited manpower and budget slashes, creating a list of offenses they will no longer investigate in person.

Among the list are vehicle accidents, embezzlement, identity theft, sex offender registration, and burglary, which are only some of the wider crimes that will be handled in online reports, not personal calls to the cops.

With these crimes being handled in a more indirect fashion, they hope that violent crime can become the focus, which is sky high in the city.

The police union is far from happy about the loss of jobs on the force, however, and are lobbying for a full reinstatement.


One Response to “List Released of Crimes Oakland Police Won’t Respond to After 80 Let Go”

  1. The Empire Strikes Back, The Ruling Class Blows Back…and The Tea Parties Circle Up | RedState on August 27th, 2010 5:46 pm

    […] all heard about this, in early July, when it was just a cop union vs city management issue, and now, that Oakland police have notified citizens THEY WON’T BE RESPONDING TO CERTAIN CRIMES, […]

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.