WaPo Features Racial Eugenics Author’s Theory of NASCAR-Ignorant Elites

October 25, 2010

(ChattahBox Political News)—What’s up with the Washington Post purposely providing a forum to discredited bigoted and homophobic cranks? Earlier in the month, the once respected Op/Ed page published the shameful racist rantings of Dinesh D’Souza, the author of the debunked Forbes Magazine screed calling President Obama a Kenyan “anti-colonialist” who is carrying out the Socialistic ideologies of a “Luo tribesman from the 1950s.” On the heels of D’Souza’s made-up dog-whistle birther nonsense, comes a piece on the Ivy League elites tea party members love to hate. And the Washington Post chose Charles Murray, author of the debunked tome of racial eugenics, “The Bell Curve” to tell us ‘I told you so,’ that the more intelligent white folks have segregated themselves in a “bubble of privilege.” And the reason teapartiers are so resentful is that these more genetically superior elites don’t even pretend to know anything about NASCAR. Oh, and they don’t vacation in tea party-favored destinations, such as Branson, Mo.

After reading Murray’s article on the “New Elite” and their clustering “in a comparatively small number of cities and in selected neighborhoods,” wherein they watch “Mad Men” on their televisions sets, instead of “The Price is Right,” or “Oprah,” it all sounds plausible. But just because Charles Murray, the hero to White Supremacists, says it’s all true, doesn’t make it so.

Remember his Bell Curve pseudo-science piece of clap trap? Murray argued that blacks and Latinos are genetically inferior to white people. And he suggested the U.S. is wasting its money on welfare programs to prop up minorities, because they are mostly incapable of succeeding on their own.

Now Murray is once again, promoting his highbrow version of racial eugenics as he educates us all on the “New Elite” Master Race. “The New Elite marry each other, combining their large incomes and genius genes, and then produce offspring who get the benefit of both,” says Murray.

So, wealthy privileged people marrying other rich people is a news flash?

It gets better. Murray, points out that President Obama somehow made it through the ranks into the “New Elite,” but assures us it’s an anomaly.

“We are watching the maturation of the cognitive stratification that Richard J. Herrnstein and I described in “The Bell Curve” back in 1994.” […]

“The more efficiently a society identifies the most able young people of both sexes, sends them to the best colleges, unleashes them into an economy that is tailor-made for people with their abilities and lets proximity take its course, the sooner a New Elite — the “cognitive elite” that Herrnstein and I described — becomes a class unto itself.”

And the New Elite and the teapartiers in Sarah Palin’s “real” America are to be forever separated, because the New Elite have “never read a “Left Behind” novel (65 million copies sold) or a Harlequin romance,” and they “are unlikely to know who Jimmie Johnson is (the really famous Jimmie Johnson, not the former Dallas Cowboys coach), and the acronym MMA means nothing to them.”

If you say so Charles Murray.

Media Matters asks the question we all want to know. “Why is the Post publishing this guy? Surely they could have found someone else maybe a tad more credible to discuss issues of education and class.” Indeed.

Both Murray and D’Souza are fellows with the conservative think tank, the American Enterprise Institute. The Southern Poverty Law Center has criticized AEI for intentionally mainstreaming bigotry using “the standard tools: prejudice, fear, disdain, misinformation, trivialization, patronizing stereotypes, demonization and even scare-mongering conspiracy theories.”

The Washington Post is apparently smitten with the American Enterprise Institute’s thinly-disguised “scholarship” of bigotry. But why?


One Response to “WaPo Features Racial Eugenics Author’s Theory of NASCAR-Ignorant Elites”

  1. Richard Keefe on October 27th, 2010 9:19 am

    Another “expert” on “The Bell Curve” who never actually READ the book. What Murray and Herrnstein actually said was that in a society that requires an average IQ to succeed, those with higher IQs will GENERALLY (not “always) enjoy advantages that those with below average IQs GENERALLY (not “always”) will not.

    That’s hardly “racist” as it applies across the board. That’s hardly rocket science and it’s definitely not “pseudo-science.”

    Furthermore, they also noted that as more and more mid-level blue- and white-collar jobs went overseas, the US would see a widening stratification of those with higher and lower IQs, the opposite legs of the “bell curve,” regardless of race.

    The number of opportunities for people of average intelligence are diminishing every day. The rich are getting richer and the poor are getting poorer. Again, please explain the “racism” in that observation?

    If the writer acknowledges the age-old reality that rich people marry other rich people, why exactly is it “promoting highbrow racial eugenics” when Murray says the exact same thing?

    As for the Southern Poverty Law Center, the litany of “tools” they accuse the AEI of using come directly out of the SPLC’s own toolbox. Few “non-profits” have mastered the black arts of demonization and scare-mongering more completely than the SPLC, which is why its bloated Endowment Fund now bulges with nearly $190 MILLION tax-free donor dollars.


    The most ironic (read: “hypocritical”) thing about the Southern Poverty Law Center is that NOT ONE of its top ten, highest paid executives is a minority.


    In fact, according to the SPLC’s hometown newspaper, the Montgomery Advertiser, despite being located LITERALLY in the back yard of Dr. Martin Luther King’s home church, the SPLC has NEVER hired a person of color to a highly paid position of power.

    Some “experts”

Got something to say? **Please Note** - Comments may be edited for clarity or obscenity, and all comments are published at the discretion of ChattahBox.com - Comments are the opinions of the individuals leaving them, and not of ChattahBox.com or its partners. - Please do not spam or submit comments that use copyright materials, hearsay or are based on reports where the supposed fact or quote is not a matter of public knowledge are also not permitted.